Could I help you?
  • Reduced price
  • New

SAE J2661

$78.00
$35.10 Save 55%
SAE J2661 2011 Edition, May 1, 2011 Optical Imaging Evaluation of Impact Damage Resistance Testing on Exterior Finishes
Quantity

Description / Abstract: This SAE Recommended Practice covers a procedure for evaluating plastic and multiple-layer coatings exposed to gravelometer testing (as defined in SAE J400) with an optical imaging and analysis system. The intent of the procedure is to detect, count and characterize instances of damage in the coated surface that fracture the top coat layer or penetrate through multiple layers of the coating system. It may be possible to extend this methodology of coating damage evaluation to specimens that have undergone test procedures or exposures that produce similar, discrete damage sites in the coating system. If so applied, evaluation results must be interpreted with respect to the limitations and intent implied by the original evaluation procedure and its associated rating system, if applicable.

Applicability

This method may be applied to the evaluation of surface damage on plastic and coated surfaces caused by means other than gravelometer testing; provided that the specimen substrate is not significantly deformed to a degree that would prevent all surface damage sites from remaining in a single focal plane capable of being adequately resolved by the image capturing device.

Application

This SAE Recommended Practice covers a procedure for evaluating plastic and multiple-layer coatings exposed to gravelometer testing (as defined in SAE J400) with an optical imaging and analysis system. The intent of the procedure is to detect, count and characterize instances of damage in the coated surface that fracture the top coat layer or penetrate through multiple layers of the coating system. It may be possible to extend this methodology of coating damage evaluation to specimens that have undergone test procedures or exposures that produce similar, discrete damage sites in the coating system. If so applied, evaluation results must be interpreted with respect to the limitations and intent implied by the original evaluation procedure and its associated rating system, if applicable.