Description / Abstract:
The authors of this guidebook and the solid propulsion industry at
large have long been troubled by
an inability to absolutely "demonstrate" SRB reliability because,
under classic reliability theory,
large numbers of tests are required to establish "statistically
significant" reliability values.
240 tests with no failures, for instance, are required to demonstrate
0.99 reliability to a 90%
confidence level if a binomial model is used. Since the testing cost
for hundreds of large motors
like the Space Shuttle SRBs would be prohibitive, the solids industry
has always been confronted
with a vexing dilemma: (1) what is the fewest number of SRBs that can
be tested to establish
reliability with high confidence level for commitment to flight and
(2) what should the reliability
that was established with fewer-than-classical numbers of tests be
called (it obviously is not
"demonstrated reliability" in the strictest sense of the definition)?
Allocation, Prediction, Verification, and Demonstration of
Reliability:
To help resolve this dilemma, the authors of this guidebook suggest a
new definition of the
reliability demonstration process for SRBs which is divided into four
steps as follows:
RELIABILITY ALLOCATION: This is the distribution or "trickling down"
of the overall system
reliability goals to the lowest component part of the system and the
identification of a target
reliability for each of these component parts.
RELIABILITY PREDICTION: This is the calculation of expected component
and motor reliabilities based
on specific design characteristics. This step may use data from a
variety of sources including
prior experience on similar systems, engineering estimates, new
technologies, etc.
RELIABILITY VERIFICATION: This is the calculation of an interim
reliability based on probabilistic
assessment methods and a limited-but-statistically-valid combination
of component, subscale, and
full-scale motor tests. The scope of verification testing on the
development program is influenced
by any differences between the allocated and predicted reliabilities.
Hardware testing usually
continues until the component and system reliabilities are shown to
exceed the predicted and
allocated values.
RELIABILITY DEMONSTRATION: This is the final calculation of system and
component reliability that
is based on all uses of the system during its lifetime. SRB
demonstration is always based on the
actual flight or static test results. Data collected for the
reliability demonstration are
attribute data, namely "success" or "failure". Using these attribute
data, statistical tools such
as binomial distribution may be used to estimate the SRB reliability
at some confidence level. Data
used for SRB reliability demonstration must come from homogeneous
sample data. Using this method to
demonstrate SRB reliability, at high confidence level, requires large
sample size attribute data
which are often not available on large SRB programs. In this case, the
confidence level of the
calculated reliability will necessarily be lower.